我查了几篇2010年后的文献,不知道算不算新,结论还是没变。倒是上面那张,85岁的5个人录得9,9,8,7,6mm,我深表怀疑。
我保留我的意见。
一
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20506961
RESULTS:[size=1.04em]Two-hundred sixty-three individuals participated. For participants aged 18 to 19 years (n=6), the mean dark-adapted pupil diameter was 6.85 mm (range: 5.6 to 7.5 mm); 20 to 29 years (n=66), 7.33 mm (range: 5.7 to 8.8 mm); 30 to 39 years (n=50), 6.64 mm (range: 5.3 to 8.7 mm); 40 to 49 years (n=51), 6.15 mm (range: 4.5 to 8.2 mm); 50 to 59 years (n=50), 5.77 mm (range: 4.4 to 7.2 mm); 60 to 69 years (n=30), 5.58 mm (range: 3.5 to 7.5 mm); 70 to 79 years (n=6), 5.17 mm (range: 4.6 to 6.0 mm); and 80 years (n=4), 4.85 mm (range: 4.1 to 5.3 mm). These values were consistent with studies using infrared photography. The standard deviation was >0.1 mm in 10 (3.8%) participants, all of whom were younger than 55 years.
二 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Disorders-of-the-pupil.-Wilhelm/be2f660213969419f9ebcfd299f845e9f5bf53ff
[size=1.04em]
|